>
you're reading...
9. Ismaili History

Who was Imam ʿAlā Dhikrihi’s Salām?

Foundation of the Ismaili Faith is based upon Karim Aga Khan having an unbroken hereditary link with  Ali (ra) who was appointed as Mawla. Ismailis recite in their Holy Dua (daily prayers), the names of their 49 Imams, the consecutive descendants of Ali (ra). Ismailis claim that this uninterrupted lineage for the last 1400 years is the proof of Karim Aga Khan’s constitutional right to the throne of Imamat by the way of designation (nass), generation after generation from an Imam to the  previous legitimate Imam. By virtue of these alleged uninterrupted designations, Karim Aga Khan has enjoyed the full authority of governance over and in respect of all religious and community matters of Ismailis.

In the following article, we examine the mysteriously absent account of three imams of the Nizari Ismailis, focusing on imam Hadi and then we look at who was Ala Zikrihis Salam and why his is actual name been deleted from the Holy Dua and replaced by just a “blessing”. Finally we look at what historians from Ismaili and non-Ismaili sources have recorded on Ala Zikrihis Salam before drawing conclusions.

1. Sketchy Details of Imam Hadi, Imam Muhtadi and Imam Qahir

2. Who was Ala Zikrihis Salam?

3. Ismaili Historical Record of Imam Hadi

4. Ismaili and non-Ismaili Records of Imam Ala Zikrihis Salam

4.1 First Evidence

4.2 Second Evidence

4.3 Third Evidence

4.4 Fourth Evidence

5. Conclusion


1. Sketchy Details of Imam Hadi, Imam Muhtadi and Imam Qahir

Ismaili historians record that the historical records of their three consecutive descendants of Ali (ra), who served as twentieth Imam (Hadi), twenty-first Imam (Muhtadi), and twenty-second Imam (Qahir), who had lived in Alamut, are very sketchy and the crucial data of their births and marriages are unavailable. The reason put forward by the Ismaili historians is that the enemies of the Nizari Ismaili Imams have torched these historical records. Therefore, only their names and years of their deaths are known to the Ismaili historians. They do not know the years of their births.

However, here is the real issue before this historians:

Biologically, no human can claim having three successive physical generations within that brief period in history – which is less than 31 years, as we shall discover from their own historical records and the chart below:

Imam # Name Birth Death
19 Nizar 1044/45 AD 1095/97 AD
20 Hadi Unknown 1136 AD
21 Muhtadi Unknown 1157 AD
22 Qahir Unknown 1162 AD
23 Ala Zikrihis Salam* 1126 AD 1167 AD
* Ala Zikrihis Salam means “on his mention, peace”. His real name was Hasan.

2. Who was Ala Zikrihis Salam?

The real name of Ala Zikrihis Salam was Hasan and is not recited by Ismailis in the ritual prayers. Instead, he is remembered as Ala Zikrihis Salam which literally means “Peace be upon his name” is recited.

Professor W. Ivanow translates his name as “whoever and wherever he may be”.  Majority of the non-Ismaili historians record that Hasan Ala-Zikrhis-Salam was the son of a Dai (missionary) and the name of his father was Muhammad bin Kiya Buzurgumid. Muhammad was not an Imam but was the Grand Master of the community of the dreaded Assassins of Alamut in Persia.

The nineteenth Imam Nizar died in the prison in the end of year the 488 AH/1095 AD and this date is well-recorded in history. His death occurred at the end of Fatimid Caliphate in Egypt. Nizar and his son Hadi, the twentieth Imam both were imprisoned in Alexandria by the then Prime Minister Afzal Badr Jamali. Some historians have claimed that the father and the son both died in Egypt.

3. Ismaili Historical Record of Imam Hadi

The Ismaili historians claim that the twentieth Imam Hadi, escaped from the prison and went to Alamut. If so, this could have only happened after the year of his imprisonment in 1095 AD. The details of the year of escape of Hadi from the prison and his journey from Egypt to Iran are not available. Ismaili historians record that after the escape Hadi settled in Alamut. There, Imam Hadi got married (that is after 1095) and he had a son, a grandson and a great-grandson (Imams twenty-first, twenty-second and twenty-third) in Alamut. The details and year of his marriage as well as the years of births for his son and the grandson are unknown.

4. Ismaili and non-Ismaili Records of Imam Ala Zikrihis Salam

Ismaili historians and non-Ismaili historians do record the birth year of great-grandson – the twenty-third Imam, Hasan (Ala Zikrihis Salam) to be 520 AH/1126 AD.

Reproduced below are the scanned images from Ismaili and non-Ismaili sources confirming that the date is 1126 AD.

What are the possibilities of having biologically three successive generations – between the years 1095 AD and 1126 AD – i.e. within a brief period of less than 31 years?

4.1 First Evidence

The first source is Dr. Farhad Daftary’s book “Ismailis: their History and Doctrines”, 1990, Cambridge,  Page 386 (hardcover copy ISBN 0-521-37019)

Daftary-ismailis-cover

fictitious names-evidence1-Daftary5

4.2 Second Evidence

H. R. H. The Agakhan Ismailia Association for Pakistan’s Gujrati history book “Ismaili Imamono Toonk Itihas, Part III”, Third Reprint – 1975, Page 119. Translated by Huzur Mukhi Abdul Muhammad Gilani.

fictitious names-evidence2-I.I.T.I.-Gujrati

4.3 Third Evidence

Alamut and Lamasar by W. Ivanow, Published by Ismaili Society Series “C”-No. 2 Printed at Kayham Press, Tehran, 1960, mentions that:

Khudawand Jalalu’d-din Hasan ‘ala dhikri-hi’s-salam was born (J.T. 88) in 520/1126, and became the fuler of the Alamut enclave on the death of Kiya Muhammad on the 3rd of Rab.I 557/20-2-1162 first being officially regarded as the son of the latter.

fictitious names - evidnce 3-Ivanow-28-History

4.4 Fourth Evidence

lewis-assassins_book coverIn the book “The Assassins – A Radical Sect in Islam” by Bernard Lewis, it is mentioned that Hasan, the son of Burzugmid publicized that he was only “outwardly” known as the son of Burzugmid. However, esoterically, he was the Imam of the time and had esoterically descended from the previous Imam. Lewis mentions that many people believed that with the Age of Resurrection (also known as the Festival of Qiyama), physical descent had ceased to be of significance and lineage of Hasan Ala Zikrihis Salam was truly of estoeric significance.

fictitious names evidence 4-Bernard-Lewis

4.5 Fifth Evidence

In the book The Order of Assassins – The Struggle of the Early Nizari Isma’ilis Against The Islamic World by Dr. Marshall G.S. Hodson – University of Chicago Committee on Social Thoughts, Mouton  & Co., 1955, it is mentioned on page 151 under the caption “Return of the Imam: Hasan’s Claims” that:

It is not clear in fact just what were Hasan’s actual claims in this respect, and what were the claims only made for him by his son, Muhammad, who succeeded within a year and a half after the Festival of Qiyama. The community itself may not have had time to become fully acquainted with Hasan’s clalims. But Muhammad certainly maintained that Hasan was not only Caliph, but the Imam himself. And it seems that Hasan himself finally claimed to be Imam in the spiritual sense, in the bâtin, though without claiming to be a descendant of Nizar in the outward sense, the zahir.

fictitious names-evidence 5-Marshall-Hodgson-151

On page 152, it is clearly mentioned that:

Hasan means that he is a “unique deputy” (naib munfarid) of the Imam; and as such he might well occupy the imam’s own position in the earth, without being himself the imam.

It goes on to conclude that:

Spiritually, he was the descendant of Nizar.

6. Conclusion

The overwhelming pieces of evidence reproduced above conclude that Hasan, commonly known as Ala Zikrihis Salam, was the son of the Grand Master of Alamut and not a physical descendant of the previous imam Qahir. There is no evidence for the current imam to claim that he is a physical descendant of Ali (ra).

The so-called Nizari Imams after Ala Zikrihis Salam up to Karim Aga Khan are the descendants of Ala Zikrihis Salam and Dai Muhammad bin Kiya Buzurgumid and not Ali (ra).

Advertisements

About Akbar Khoja

Giving out free #LessonsInIsmailism.

Leave a Reply using your facebook account by typing in the box and clicking the Facebook logo on the right

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Rethinking Ismailism

Inside Ismailism

%d bloggers like this: